The debate over the possible bigfoot picture from the Upper Peninsula of Michigan has somewhat of a new development.
A second photo showing what is clearly a bear seemingly ended the U.P. Michigan bigfoot photo mystery but not so fast claim some bigfoot enthusiasts. Could the bear in the second photo be a different animal altogether from the one seen in the first UP Michigan bigfoot picture? Sure plenty of skeptics will be quick to dismiss this idea but many are comparing this new picture from Michigan to previous photos from Pennsylvania believed to be of a juvenile bigfoot called the jacobs trail cam photos.
It is hard to deny that there seem to be some similarities between the recent UP Michigan bigfoot photo and the Jacobs bigfoot photos from back in 2007. Now the real question is do these similarities prove that both are indeed nothing more than bears or could they both be a juvenile big foot. There are some striking aspects of both photos that really don’t seem to be “bear-like” leaving many with more questions than answers. The jacobs photos consisted of three separate shots one of which clearly shows bear cubs yet the subject in the following pictures does not seem to be the same at all.
Many point to this same situation in respects to the possible Michigan bigfoot picture. Does the bear in the second photo look anything like the subject captured in the original photo? Many point to the fact that the time frame between the two pictures could easily allow them to be two different animals. So let’s compare the subjects in both sets of photos and try and determine if they all looks like they may be bears.
UP Michigan photos
Now in both cases it can be argued that these are nothing more then bears at odd and interesting angles but at the same time, the variances can surely be argued that these animals are clearly dissimilar. So what do you think bear or bigfoot? Perhaps the misidentification on both accounts is mistaking bears for what is actually a bigfoot sighting!